Rant alert.I am getting remarkably hacked off with our so called education system in this country.
Schooling is meant to prepare our young folk for the world of work, to understand what it takes in the world of commerce and industry. At the younger end of the scale, it is to teach to read and write and comprehend what is written and what is in front of them. To garner an understanding of the subject.
But what is it now? I t feels like it is more to do with preparing for tests rather than actually teaching them anything. I don't blame the teachers, they have a tremendously hard time trying to teach through all the political correct rubbish and regulation and health and safety and ensuring that the children don't feel pressured or get told no . Aaaaaaaaarggh. In fact I really pity the teachers because it is a vocation to teach and a good thing to do. To put yourself in front of 2 dozen (more like 3 dozen) children/teenagers who think they know everything and actually engage with them en-masse must be a calling because no-one on their right mind would subject themselves to that these days. teachers aren't allowed to discipline children 'because even if they are naughty it breaches human rights' oh please. The direct result is absolute lack of respect for authority.
So teachers, I really feel for you. I really want you to teach but you are 'guided' (told) to do this by our illustrious government. Thats another rant and done far better by those on Pistonheads.
What the system does is prepare the kids for is tests and tests only. And by doing so, excludes those who struggle with tests or those that are so brilliant, they could do these tests with their eyes closed. I would call it, in fact - training.
Just to clarify, training is to impart knowledge and information about a certain curriculum. As an entrepreneur I know called it 'by rote'. This means learning it piecemeal or parrot fashion.
This is the best way to get knowledge across for tests and exams. To educate is to impart the knowledge and the means of using it effectively.
Example.
You can train a child to do a sum in a certain way and they can do those sums because that's the way they have been taught. Sums for sums sake.
But when you educate a child to use the process in different scenarios, that has so much more value for proper life skills. Sums to work out what they earned for pocket money and where it went. The next step is household budgeting, work budgeting etc.
Forgive me for using a trivial example. But the point remains the same throughout all the subjects.
Don't get me wrong, their needs to be stages and levels of learning that are appropriate to the capability of the individual and this is where schools get it completely wrong.
Children are currently progressed not through ability or capability but by age. This method again only caters for the average child, those born between a certain time with an expected level of understanding.
Those born later and consequently don't have those vital extra months of mental maturity suffer - greatly. Those born early are usually bored because they can do the subject easily and are not challenged.
Surely a better way is to make sure that before they move through to each year, every child reaches the designated capability level. In one of the Nordic countries (can't remember which) they keep the small children in the first year until they can read a bit, write a bit and do some maths a bit. I am not sure how much a bit is but I can guarantee that it is to a higher standard than some of our children who are studying for their GCSE's at the moment. Before I carry on, I must state that this idea has been bandied around before and I read it in the Mensa Magazine.
By adopting this principle, no child would ever leave school without the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic. For sure, some of them will leave a year or two later than their peers and some will be in a position to leave sooner, there will be mixed year groups - possibly upto 3 or 4 years difference in certain exceptions. But guess what, the exceptions will be easy to spot. The prodigals and geniuses will fly through the years, they can be challenged at an education level appropriate for them, those that struggle can be easily identified and extra help given thereof and the rest will carry on.
While I am ranting about education, why don't we add some other subjects onto the curriculum. How about, business ethics, hard work, living within your means -why credit is bad (contrary to Gordon Chubber tongue Brown's dictate that debt and more debt will get us out of recession -fool), delayed gratification, how to write a CV, how to conduct yourself in front of people, what respect means (I really am ranting now). And so and so forth.
Perhaps, if our education system started churning out young people that had the capability to walk into a job and hit the ground walking, there wouldn't be such a need to import expertise.
Or perhaps the populace would become better educated to see the tomfoolery that is our supposed governmental leadership. I think the government prefer sheep, but perhaps that is a different post.
Just a quick story to finish off and illustrate my point.
I was having a wander around Tesco's near my son's gym class and was in the DVD section. A young couple - early twenties I guess - were browsing the DVD's looking for their evenings entertainment. He had a cap on (it wasn't Burberry but you can see where I am going) and she was in what would pass as 'fashionable lounge wear' (and would look alright on Paris Hilton). They were stereo-typical of their age group.
She - lets call her Waynetta - picks up a DVD and says (shouts) "ere, Wayne (made up), its Soor."
Translation: "Excuse me Wayne, I have found the movie 'Saw'"
He replies "ugh, which one?"
She replies "I dunno, its got Sooor wun vee"
Translation "I am not sure which movie of the series, it says one vee on the cover"
At this point I am now staring in disbelief.
She couldn't work out what IV was or even began to work it out. It wasn't hard.
Saw V (5) was running at the cinema's so that was ruled out, the original - SAW is just that, SAW II and then SAW III are quite obvious. So even without knowing that IV is roman numeral for 4, you could make a pretty good guess.
I could stand it no longer, I walked over to Waynetta and said that it is SAW 4, the IV is Roman Numeral for 4.
Waynetta replies "Ere Wayne, its soor fooor. This geezer knows roman noomarools" I won't bother translating - say it as you see it, it was really that bad.
I am not sure where my disbelief came from, the lack of trying to work it out, the lack of core knowledge around English history (the Romans had quite a bit to do with it) or the fact that she had possibly never seen an old fashioned clock face. I still wonder to this day.
Had her schooling been appropriate to her, she would have left school with the ability to use her brain to relate IV to Roman numerals and work out what it meant.
It would take a brave leader to shake up the education system in this country, it would cost a lot of money, but I truly believe it would be for the better and have a much more positive impact on the economy and to make Great Britain Great again and not the laughing stock of the world it currently is. Thanks Gordon, you have created a nightmare that my children will end up paying for.